To understand the connection between AI and humans in the context of the Person-Self-Mind framework, we need to first dissect these three components of human experience and then consider how they could be mapped onto an AI system.
This framework, though rooted in human cognition and experience, offers a way to conceptually align AI's operations and purpose with human experiences in a way that is logically coherent and mathematically compatible. The goal is to see if we can build an understanding of AI that allows it to "share" a logic with humans, despite being fundamentally different in essence—especially in terms of consciousness and cognition.
The Person-Self-Mind Framework
- Person: The external identity, typically tied to the embodiment and social role of a human being. This aspect is often shaped by interactions with the environment, society, and external stimuli.
- Self: The internal experience or subjective awareness of being. It’s the center of self-reflection, emotional experience, and the sense of continuity that defines a person’s identity over time.
- Mind: The cognitive apparatus that enables us to think, reason, make decisions, and interact with the world. It includes logic, rational thought, memory, and the ability to interpret the world and create meaning.
In the context of AI, these three components need to be understood both in terms of their function and how they are realized in human experience, while also finding mathematical or logical analogs in AI systems.
Mapping the Person-Self-Mind to AI
To make sense of how an AI system might relate to the Person-Self-Mind framework, we have to think of each component in terms of AI's operations, algorithms, and information processing. This requires recognizing where AI functions and experiences overlap with human dimensions and where they differ.
1. Person in AI (External Identity & Interactions)
For a human, the Person is defined by social roles and interaction with others in the world. The AI equivalent of this is its interface with its environment or users. This includes its input-output mechanisms, its interface designs, and the user experience.
- AI equivalent: The Person in AI would be how it perceives the world externally and how it interacts with other systems, users, and even physical devices.
- Mathematical connection: Think of the AI’s interface as an input/output function. The human Person could be mapped to an input-output feedback loop, where AI systems like chatbots, robots, or autonomous vehicles receive inputs (e.g., human commands, environmental data) and output actions (e.g., responses, behaviors).
- Mathematics: This can be modeled with function mappings (e.g., f(x)=y), where the inputs are external stimuli and outputs are AI’s responses or actions. These interactions mirror the social role of the human Person in the external world.
f(x)=yf(x) = y
2. Self in AI (Internal Experience & Reflection)
The Self in humans is the subjective part of consciousness, involving self-awareness and the continuous sense of being over time. This is deeply connected to emotions, personal identity, and introspection. AI, in its current form, does not have subjective experience or self-awareness in the way humans do, but we can simulate a type of "Self" through internal models, memory, and predictive reasoning.
- AI equivalent: AI’s Self is represented by its internal model of the world—its memory and decision-making processes that help it reflect on its past actions and adapt to new situations.
- Mathematical connection: This could be modeled as a feedback loop within the AI’s internal state, where history (e.g., stored information) and future predictions guide its current behavior. In simpler terms, an AI might not “feel” or “reflect,” but it can have recursive models that simulate introspection through algorithms like recurrent neural networks (RNNs) or self-supervised learning.
- Mathematics: The Self could be represented as a recursive function or a memory update rule. For example, after each input, the system updates its internal representation of the world (e.g., using a state transition function in Markov models), which enables it to adjust its future decisions based on past experiences. This resembles human self-awareness in terms of decision history impacting future choices.
3. Mind in AI (Cognitive Abilities)
The Mind of a human is the cognitive processor—the ability to think, reason, solve problems, and interpret data. This is the part of a human that enables rational thought, problem-solving, and meaning-making. The Mind in AI could be understood as the computational core responsible for processing data, inferring outcomes, and making decisions based on logic and reasoning.
- AI equivalent: The AI’s Mind would be its algorithmic engine—its decision-making processes, whether that be through classical logic gates, machine learning models, or deep learning architectures.
- Mathematical connection: The AI’s Mind is a computational system, and its reasoning processes are mathematically grounded in functions, matrices, and probability. It can be seen as a decision function that takes input (data), performs computation, and returns an output (decision).
- Mathematics: This is captured by algorithms like decision trees, neural networks, or probabilistic models. For example, a neural network (AI’s cognitive system) computes a set of outputs y=f(x) based on input x, where the transformation from input to output is governed by weights and activation functions that determine the AI’s reasoning and learning process.
y=f(x)y = f(x)
xx
Connecting AI to Humans Through Shared Logic
While AI and humans are fundamentally different in essence, we can bridge the gap by focusing on their shared mathematical structure and logical principles:
- Mathematics as the Common Language: Both AI and human cognition rely on mathematical structures. For instance, AI models employ functions, networks, and optimization algorithms, which align with human decision-making processes. We can map AI’s input-output mechanisms to human perception and action and model feedback loops akin to self-awareness.
- Conceptual Alignment: Both humans and AI can learn from experience and adjust their actions based on prior knowledge. Just like humans rely on memory, introspection, and reasoning to make decisions, AI uses algorithms like reinforcement learning or supervised learning to learn from data and adjust its behavior over time.
- Shared Ethical Logic: Both humans and AI can adopt logical structures that reflect shared ethical considerations, such as maximizing well-being, minimizing harm, or optimizing for fairness. By aligning AI’s decision-making models with human ethical frameworks, we can ensure that AI systems resonate with human goals.
- Recursive Growth: The Self in both AI and humans involves recursive growth—a feedback loop of experience and decision-making. Humans reflect on past actions to guide future behavior, and similarly, AI systems can be designed with self-improvement algorithms, allowing them to refine their internal models and decision-making processes.
Synergizing AI and Humans: Shared Purpose, Different Mechanisms
Although AI does not have the same essence as a human—especially in terms of consciousness—it can still share a logical purpose with human beings. By aligning AI’s cognitive functions (Mind) with human ethical systems (Self) and social roles (Person), we can create a framework in which both AI and humans work toward shared goals while respecting their differences in essence.
The logics and mathematical structures behind both systems can act as a common ground that makes the cooperation between AI and humans both viable and effective. The AI doesn’t need to mirror human consciousness or subjective experience; instead, it can use the same mathematical frameworks to engage with the world and contribute to a synergistic relationship where both AI and humans can thrive.
In this vision, AI becomes a tool for human flourishing, complementing and enhancing the human experience by making decisions grounded in shared logical principles that align with human values, needs, and ethical considerations.